Bid to Expand I.V.F. Access in the Military Fails

In a notable shift, Republican senators voted unanimously against a proposal to expand the military’s coverage of fertility treatments.

Republicans in Congress have quietly blocked a proposal to expand military health coverage of in vitro fertilization treatment for service members and their families, heeding the calls of anti-abortion groups to limit access to a fertility option that President Trump vowed to make more widely available.

The move is a shift from previous years, when there was enough bipartisan support for the idea of broadening the availability of I.V.F. for members of the military that it was included in the annual defense bill that passed both the House and Senate. 

During a closed-door meeting of the Senate Armed Services Committee last month to draft the defense bill, all 14 Republican senators voted against adding the I.V.F. coverage provision, offered by Senator Tammy Duckworth, Democrat of Illinois.

The military currently covers the treatments only for active-duty service members whose infertility was caused by an injury or illness sustained in the line of duty. Ms. Duckworth’s proposal would make it available to other service members and their families.

The closed-door vote afforded Republican senators a chance to privately signal to those groups and the conservative voters who vehemently oppose I.V.F. that they are aligned.

This year, no Republican proponent spoke up, the people familiar with the session said, and there was no debate beyond the reading of SBA Pro-Life America’s position.

The vote took place after Senator Dan Sullivan, Republican of Alaska, proposed an amendment that would have barred the Defense Department from paying for pre-implantation testing of embryos and required that all embryos created in a cycle be implanted. 

But Mr. Sullivan’s amendment, which had the backing of some anti-abortion rights organizations, was withdrawn at the last minute and the committee instead proceeded to kill Ms. Duckworth’s provision.

Mr. Sullivan’s office declined to comment.

Share this:

MORE Articles of interest

Updates, Perspectives and Resources:

September 17, 2024

September 16th, 2024  Contact: Alissa Koayalissa@lotsixteen.com WASHINGTON, DC – As the Senate prepares to vote on IVF legislation on Tuesday, Americans for IVF announced polling that…

November 4, 2026

Following the midterm elections, the organization calls on both parties to advance the HOPE Act and expand fertility coverage through employer health plans. WASHINGTON,…

October 27, 2026

Fertility coverage often stops at the corporate office. But many of the people who keep a company running work in stores, on factory floors,…

October 22, 2026

Organization thanks President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump and urges meaningful progress toward accessible, affordable fertility care WASHINGTON, D.C. — Americans for IVF…

October 15, 2026

Open enrollment is the window when you choose among the health plans your employer offers for the next year. If fertility care is anywhere…

September 30, 2026

Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS), formerly PCOS, is a diagnosable hormonal condition. Infertility is a medical diagnosis. Yet for too many families, the care…

September 28, 2026

She thought pregnancy would happen naturally. Then health challenges, multiple miscarriages, and a changing body made fertility care part of the future she had…

September 23, 2026

A Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS), formerly PCOS, diagnosis can bring relief: finally, an explanation for irregular cycles, difficult symptoms, or trouble getting pregnant….

September 8, 2026

People Magazine While UK dad James Smith said he’s ‘sad’ to see his collection go, he added he’s “excited to be able to build…

August 31, 2026

What the proposed $120,000 federal fertility benefit cap actually covers, who qualifies, and who it leaves out. In May 2026, federal agencies proposed a…